Comparing ethical theories

Develops character, not just obey laws this is a strength. You develop an image of what the ideal person is. The wise teach the young.

Comparing ethical theories

Essentially, both men regarded morality from the perspective that the ends don't necessarily Comparing ethical theories the means. Likewise, both men believed in logically deciphering what was righteous and moral. But the basis for truly understanding them lies in understanding their differences.

Both men argued that an act was moral is if were undertaken with a moral cause in mind. More plainly stated, in There are some staunch and subtle difference between the two men.

More plainly stated, in most situations, the morality of an individual is judged by his action, not by the outcome of that action. Both men believed that logic was the only way to understand the moral world. They argued that emotions alone were too subjective to be useful in making moral claims.

Both men argued and understood that there were some actions that were intrinsically evil, and should never be taken. According to Kant, the ends were never to be considered if an action were morally undertaken.

To that end, regardless of how the choice to act turned out, the act would always be moral, if it began as a moral act. For Aristotle, this belief was mostly true as well. The fundamental difference between the two men is that Aristotle argued that if the ends were considered, found to be totally unjust, and no other alternative was present, the action would still be morally righteous if it were taken.

However, if the ends were considered, found to be unmet, and a better alternative were present, but it were not taken, the action could be ruled immoral! He argued this because the choice to do what was ill-suited for the greatest good was never a moral decision.

Kant's theories are argued from a deontological perspective, in that they are not situational. Kant believed that morality was ruled by laws and codes of actions. Aristotle argued that morality was ruled as a variance between extremes.

His theories were more teleological, because they could be situational. Aristotle argued that a person was virtuous if he upheld goodwill for the greatest good and made choices based on that ideal. For Arostotle, virtue was measurable.

Kant believed that this was a false construct, because goodwill was unquantifiable, and was determined by law so it never changed.Mill's ethical theory offers an insight.

Comparing ethical theories

Mill's utilitarian ethical theory provides a rule that illuminates this quandary. Utilitarian theory supports Machiavelli's 'the end justifies the means'; "according to the utilitarian opinion, the end of human action, is necessarily also the standard of morality" (Mill ch II). Mill’s ethical theory offers an insight.

Mill’s utilitarian ethical theory provides a rule that illuminates this quandary. Utilitarian theory supports Machiavelli’s ‘the end justifies the means’; “according to the utilitarian opinion, the end of human action, is necessarily also the standard of morality” (Mill ch II).

First, discuss what teleological ethical theories and deontological theories of ethics are, comparing the two. Next, give examples of how ethical conduct would be analyzed according to each of these two types of theories. Comparing Ethical Theories Ethics is a philosophy that studies morality.

Principles of doing right and wrong are inspired by ethical theories such as virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and deontology.

Virtue Ethics Virtue is synonymous with quality.

Ethical Theories Compared This is a quick overview of some relations between utilitarian, deontological, and Aristotelian ethical theories. For links to many excellent internet resources on these ethical theories and others, see Lawrence Hinman's Ethics Updates site.3/5(2). Kant's theories are argued from a deontological perspective, in that they are not situational. Kant believed that morality was ruled by laws and codes of actions. Aristotle argued that morality was ruled as a variance between extremes. Ethical Theory Comparison Chart HU Utilitarianism Ethical Egoism Ethics of Care Kantianism Prima Facie Duties Divine Command Theory Virtue Theory How is “good” Determined Acting in the interest of all involved, with one’s self being included%(37).

Virtue ethics, known as character ethics, is a theory based upon the qualities of goodness and quality. Ethical Theories Compared This is a quick overview of some relations between utilitarian, deontological, and Aristotelian ethical theories.

For links to many excellent internet resources on these ethical theories and others, see 5/5(1). Compare and Contrast two ethical theories Essay Sample. In this essay I have chosen to compare two opposing theories, Immanuel Kant’s absolutist deontological ethics and Joseph Fletchers relativist situation ethics.

Compare and contrast ethical theories… | philosophyfactory